What does each speaker want from this conversation?

Watch the briefing

Watch the full video on YouTube

Full briefing transcript

Mara and the inspector politely agree that a departure needs discussion. Yet neither tries to make a decision happen. Give them immediate aims: Mara wants permission; the inspector wants to avoid liability. Now a signature request meets a condition about responsibility. Before polishing the wording, decide what each speaker is trying to get from the other person.

The before passage reads: Mara placed the departure form on the inspector's desk. We should discuss departure. Yes, we should discuss it. It would be good to decide. I agree. The speakers acknowledge the same need, but the replies do not test a condition, reveal resistance, or secure agreement to an action. We know the topic without yet knowing what either person will do about it.

Try this revision. Mara placed the departure form on the inspector's desk. Sign this, and I can send the boat. The inspector turned the form toward her. Whose name goes beside route checked? I'll take the responsibility. Then put your name there before you ask for mine. Mara asks for permission in a physical form; the inspector makes the request contingent on an acknowledgment Mara has not yet written.

Label the moves, not just the feelings. Mara requests a signature. The inspector redirects her toward the responsibility field. Mara offers an assurance. The inspector tests whether she will turn that assurance into an action. Her condition serves her aim: she wants a named commitment before adding her own signature. What matters here is how the distinct aims shape the replies.

An intention is often a verb: persuade, postpone, reassure, conceal, or understand. It can change during a conversation. If Mara discovers that the inspector doubts her route, she might stop seeking a signature and start seeking the reason for that doubt. Mark the new aim where it changes. A single label for the whole character can miss what a particular line is trying to accomplish.

Purpose does not require everyone to argue. Two people can want to comfort each other, solve the same problem, or enjoy being together. Our revision favors negotiation and keeps the question unresolved; it loses the easy rapport of the first version. Do not force conflict into a scene that needs warmth. The useful check is whether each reply fits the person's aim and the other person's preceding move.

Choose one exchange and write an immediate intention beside each name. Under each line, name its tactic. If a reply changes nothing, try a different tactic or an action that reveals the response. Then read the whole sequence, not only the improved line. Assign an intention to each speaker before editing lines. Next, we will distinguish voices through what people notice and how they phrase it.