Artificial Intelligence · Evidence and source dates listed below
How do I know when to stop revising with AI?
Set concrete finish criteria before revising, then stop when the reviewed draft passes them.
Watch the briefing
Full briefing transcript
The sign-up reminder already includes the deadline, the link placeholder, and the limited-capacity caveat. A new suggestion changes friendly to warm, then another changes warm to welcoming. Is the task improving, or are we choosing between preferences? Set a finish condition before iterating.
When the draft meets the required facts, format, tone, and review checks, optional alternatives are not a reason to keep the work open indefinitely. Our invented event is an adult seed-swapping workshop on November twenty-eighth, at two in the afternoon, in Pine community room. Sign-up closes November twenty-fourth at five in the afternoon. Capacity is limited, and a booking is confirmed only after the organizer replies.
The message must be under seventy words, have a courteous tone, and contain a clearly marked sign-up link placeholder. No real registration link is supplied in this exercise. Before drafting, we write the finish condition: all event and deadline facts retained, capacity and confirmation caveats intact, under seventy words, link placeholder visible, no unsupported promise, and human review complete. These checks are specific enough to inspect.
A desire for the best possible wording is not a usable stopping rule, because each new alternative can open another comparison without showing that the message works better. Our bad illustrative reminder says: everyone is booked once they sign up, and places are unlimited. It also leaves out the deadline. That fails even if the invitation sounds cheerful.
We revise for those failures, not for adjectives. The corrected mock supplies the event, deadline, limited capacity, and reply-based confirmation. Its placeholder stays visible. We have repaired the required meaning before considering optional style.
Read the actual corrected text on screen: please sign up for the adult seed-swapping workshop in Pine community room on November twenty-eighth at two. Sign-up closes November twenty-fourth at five. Capacity is limited; your booking is confirmed only after the organizer replies. Use the bracketed sign-up link.
The full mock has forty-one words under our count. Check it against each finish criterion, then mark the review complete for this fictional exercise. Now another illustrative suggestion offers join us instead of please sign up. That is optional wording, not a failed criterion.
The owner can choose it once and recheck the affected sentence, or keep the existing draft and stop. Stopping does not mean publishing automatically. A placeholder must be replaced and verified before actual use, and any new source fact can reopen the review. A finish condition applies to its defined task and version.
Revise when a criterion fails or a relevant fact changes; stop when the defined draft checks pass and remaining alternatives are merely preferences. In this example, completion means a reviewed placeholder draft, not a sent invitation. Keep the stopping point honest. Next, we will assemble safe input, drafting, checks, and an owner's decision into one recurring workflow.
Practical takeaway
Set concrete finish criteria before revising, then stop when the reviewed draft passes them.
Disclosures
AI-assisted production and synthetic narration. Original teaching examples and diagrams; linked third-party sources retain their respective rights.
Original sources and limits
- OpenAI Developers — Evaluation best practices — checked 2026-09-17. First-party guidance on task-specific criteria and evaluation, applied to an original fictional reminder; no actual model trial, measured efficiency or universal stopping rule.